Providing Experiences for the Next Generation of Professionals

Getting people back to what they love is the job of an athletic trainer. Ensuring there are plenty of high-caliber graduates ready to serve active populations is the job of universities and colleges, whose programs provide interactive learning environments that will prepare students to enter the profession.

Advanced Physical Therapy & Sports Medicine (APTSM) plays a vital role in the process.

“It’s important we offer internships and job shadowing opportunities for those on the path to becoming athletic trainers,” said APTSM’s Traci Tauferner. “The field is projected to grow 25% by the end of the decade.”

While there is a broad range of settings for the athletic trainer—physician practices, professional sports, clinics specializing in sports medicine, occupational health, and performing arts, to name a few—the vast majority of graduates will enter the field’s most traditional setting: schools.

That’s where Tauferner started out after earning her athletic training degree at UW-Oshkosh. With a robust resume developed since her graduation—she’s the Director of Industrial & Tactical Medicine at Advanced—Tauferner now devotes time both to her administrative duties as well as to the onsite therapy services she delivers at multiple locations.

Tauferner is committed to bringing attention to industrial athletic training, especially as the need for athletic trainers to prevent, evaluate, manage, and rehabilitate conditions faced by workforces—directly at companies and municipalities—continues to grow.

“Achieving injury prevention and cost control in this day and age for the industries and tactical groups we serve is not just a desired outcome,” said Tauferner. “In many cases, it’s a matter of survival.”

More than 55 Wisconsin companies and organizations utilize Advanced PT’s hallmark program of onsite wellness solutions. APTSM’s dedication to workplace health and safety has contributed to recognition at local, state, and national levels.

That kind of focus includes providing learning opportunities for those interested in pursuing a career in the field, and Tauferner is passionate about students understanding the paths available to them.

“It’s important for us to provide these experiences for the next generation, especially so in the bourgeoning industrial and tactical realms, as fewer than 5% of graduates are going into those sectors,” she said.

The connection between APTSM and Tauferner’s alma mater remains strong, as evidenced by UW-Oshkosh student Cade Littleton’s recent experience.

Littleton, a senior in the Masters of Athletic Training Program, spent the summer working through four specific rotations: clinical, hospital, professional team, and industrial/tactical.

Littleton said a few football injuries (“some hip and shoulder pain, but nothing huge like a blown ACL”) led him to seek treatment. Though his high school didn’t have a traditional athletic trainer, a nearby orthopedic group supplied the small school with a physical therapist, and Littleton found himself fascinated by the PT’s skills.

“I was just very interested in what he did, so much so that I actually job shadowed him for one of my classes,” said Littleton. “That set me on the PT path, but once I got to school and got a little more experience with athletic training, I became drawn to that, to work with a younger and highly active population.”

To meet the requirements of the program, one of Littleton’s rotations had him paired with Tauferner.

“This was actually the third time I had met Traci,” said Littleton. “I met her following a presentation she did on mental health, then at the WATA (Wisconsin Athletic Trainers’ Association) conference this year.”

For two weeks Littleton followed Tauferner’s schedule (“yeah, she starts early”), which included stints with the tactical groups she services.

“It was cool to see the firefighters and police officers and how they handle things at their own facilities,” said Littleton. “It was a lot different than my traditional experiences.”

With those tactical groups, Tauferner gave Littleton the opportunity to do full evaluations; she provided guidance, talking Littleton through treatment options and giving him the chance to “do his own thing.”

“Traci allowed me to do a lot more hands-on than I expected, so that was really cool,” he said.

He also learned about Tauferner’s use of and advocacy for modern cupping techniques.

“Just how she used cupping and explained it so it made sense to the client was very interesting,” said Littleton. “That helped me a lot because I’m still a student trying to figure this stuff out.”

Asked about key takeaways following the rotation, Littleton doesn’t hesitate.

“The experience pushes me to continue to learn, to ask questions, and to demand respect as Traci does.”

Littleton admitted he’d like to replicate the demeanor Tauferner exhibited throughout their time together.

“Traci’s vibe is straight confidence,” said Littleton. “The setting doesn’t matter.”

Summer rotations are complete, Littleton is now working with UW-O’s athletic trainer for 2023 football season. Set to graduate next May, Littleton is currently leaning towards working in the high school or college setting, but he’s not ruling anything out.

“I’m not 100% sure yet,” said Littleton.

If uncertain about his job setting, Littleton expresses a clearer view in the geographic sense.

“I’m up to moving,” he said. “I’m not a huge fan of winter.”

—

If you or a student you know is interested in experiencing what Advanced does every day, contact us today!.

Clinician Spotlight- Ryan Bailey, PT, DPT.

Meet Ryan Bailey, PT, DPT.

I distinctly heard him say “Central Waters.”

And when a physical therapist gets invited to Amherst, WI to share his expertise, then we’re talking about more than just tapping into the body’s internal mechanisms to relieve pain.

Oooh. Tell me more.

“No, Central Woggers,” he said. “It’s a running group in Amherst. Think the name’s a play on words, a combination of walk and jog.”

Oh, gotcha. I’m guessing this will be more about pain relief than beer.

“Well, those topics aren’t mutually exclusive,” he said.

I like this guy already.

Meet Ryan Bailey, physical therapist at Advanced PT. Recently he was invited to share some of his knowledge with the Central Woggers before they took off for a run.

“So, what topic did they want you to focus on?” I asked.

“Oh, they let me choose,” said Bailey.

Golly, that narrows it down. Bailey’s experience and specialties include working with high-level athletes and orthopedic injuries, foot and ankle dysfunction, pre and post-operative joint replacement and general rehabilitation including ACL reconstruction, sports medicine and biomechanics, just to name a few.

“I decided to give a talk on exercise and pain relief, and why we feel good when we walk and run and exercise,” Bailey said. “More or less about the natural substances within our body to relieve pain that we can tap into instead of relying on medications. Then into anterior knee pain many runners can experience and what the research tells us about strengthening the knee.”

Bailey was under some pressure from the assembled group of several dozen runners to hit the presentation out of the park, as the week prior a nurse and wellness coach named Martha Bailey did just that.

“Yeah, Martha is my wife. She’s pretty good,” said Bailey. “I understand they are inviting her back.”

While he is a frequent runner, Bailey considers running more of a cross training component for some of the many other sports on which he focuses, one of which is surf ski racing. Designed for ocean paddling, surf skis are sit-on top kayaks that are sleek, fast and very tippy. Bailey competed in the sport, a popular pastime with lifeguards, while living in Hawaii and California. Even though it’s tough to find anywhere near the surf ski racing opportunities here in Wisconsin, Bailey still manages to keep his skills sharp.

“There’s actually a very good 17 mile race here called ‘Race the Fox,’ which goes from Berlin to Omro,” he said. “It’s something I’ve done since moving back to Wisconsin.”

Bailey met his Wisconsinite wife in California, where he lived for 30 years, when she went out west for a nursing job. They got married in San Diego and returned to Wisconsin to start their family. They and their three daughters now reside in the house Martha grew up in, located in Fremont. Not surprisingly, their children are into sports and activities just as mom and dad are, and the family takes full advantage of the gamut of outdoor activities Wisconsin has to offer.

And he insists he doesn’t miss the ocean and the beaches.

“I love it here in Wisconsin,” Bailey said. Bailey coaches a number of area teams and is committed to being a resource for youth sports and being there for families after an athlete’s injury. He’s also committed to helping community members stay active and healthy, hence his visit to the Central Woggers.

It seems as if the transplanted Californian has found the perfect place to be.

Learn more here: https://www.advancedptsm.com/ryan-bailey

Building Strength

Mitchell Fromm (UW-SP) and Bryan Stuettgen, MPT

Strength is a necessary component of daily living.  Our bodies are designed to respond to stresses placed on them.  The higher the activity level, provided adequate recovery, the more they will adapt to overcome those stressors.  As we age it becomes increasingly important to maintain the recoverable level of stress that will promote growth and maintain strength to reduce injury and prevent muscle loss.

Need for Strength

Within the next 10-15 years, an estimated 30% of the US population will be elderly, putting them at greater risk of health problems and loss of function.  The US National Center for Health Statistics reports the average person spends about 15% of their life in an unhealthy state due to disability, injury or disease occurring in old age (Hunter, 2004).

Age is a major contributing factor to the loss of musculature.  At age 30 muscle breakdown begins to exceed muscle growth.  At age 50 1% of total muscle strength can diminish annually and by age 65 the rate has been found to be around 3% per year (Kennis, 2013).  This age-related loss of muscle contributes greatly to the risk of falling and injury as well as muscle strains and other injuries.  Age-related strength loss is generally characterized by reduced muscle mass and strength and is manifested by preferential type II myofiber atrophy (Hunter, 2004, Van Roie 2013).  It has been considered type II fibers are not able to be activated as well in older populations due to this atrophy and denervation.  Type II muscle fiber type responds better to weight training for strength and power for growth and maintenance over type I which is characterized by its endurance properties.

There are multiple approaches to building strength.  The muscle can advance by recruiting more of the available muscle through training.  Weight lifting or similar activity teaches the muscle to recruit more of the available fibers that exist.  To recruit and utilize muscle a nerve pathway must be available.  Weight training also builds and improves this neuro-muscular connection allowing for more muscle fiber recruitment and better precision of movement.  Another training goal could be hypertrophy or the enlargement of muscle.  Creating more muscle allows for a larger pool of recruitment, which can lead to increased strength through training.  Training cycles targeting both strength and hypertrophy should be included to maximally stimulate muscle fibers and best improve overall growth potential.

Power is lost at an even faster rate than strength.  This loss is directly related to functional ability in daily living.  A study by Pereira (2012) led to findings suggesting that training cessation up to 6 weeks is sufficient to induce significant losses in dynamic strength in 1RM (1 rep maximum weight).  To some extent, functional capacity, and especially explosive force, may be preserved after high-speed power training.  As the older population is more susceptible to detraining from missed activity due to injury or illness, power training should be considered when building an exercise program.

Loss of power generation may also be attributed to the lowered ability to create creatine-kinase during aging, a fuel the body creates and uses to generate power. Calcium release also decreases with age limiting the contraction-relaxation cycle of muscle, and inadequate protein has proven to limit growth potential as it is a staple of building and maintaining muscle.  As they say, the temple cannot be created without the bricks.  Detailing appropriate nutritional adaptations is outside of the scope of this paper, however, proper nutrition must be considered to achieve training adaptations and individual recommendations should be sought by a qualified trainer or nutritionist.

 

Strength in everyday life

Strength is a necessary component in the completion of daily tasks. Walking, maintaining an upright posture, and balance all have strength components where failure in any of the mechanisms may lead to compounding injuries.  Motions beyond them such as bending, lifting, squatting, and transporting items have requisite strength requirements for completion without injury.  The need for strength is apparent and crucial for those seeking to maintain their independence.  Being able to complete tasks unaided reduces or eliminates the need for assisted living while reducing or eliminating those associated costs.  Strength training extends the length of time a person is able to maintain independent motion barring other complicating factors.

Implementing strength training programs can have long-lasting effects.  A long term strength study by Kennis (2013) found that increases in muscle strength and muscle power after a 1-year strength-training intervention theoretically can compensate for age-related losses over 3 to 5 years. Moreover, 7 years after their enrollment in the study, participants of the {strength training intervention} group experienced a significantly lower loss in basic strength compared with the {control} group. 

 

Protocol

Muscle reductions from age are found to be due to multiple factors.  Training both the nervous system as well as targeting the muscle fibers are necessary for a successful strength program.  It is commonly accepted that strength training should be conducted by lifting above 80% of the 1 rep maximum with sets of 6 or fewer repetitions, and hypertrophic training with weights between 67-80% for sets of 6-12 repetitions.  Though these current standards are accurate for those goals, they are not entirely definite and certainly are not exclusive.  Studies conducted and compiled by Van Roie (2013) have examined the growth ability utilizing low weight high rep protocols and found hypertrophy was achievable when the training sessions achieved momentary muscular failure.  Henneman's size principle of motor unit recruitment indicates that, when a submaximal contraction is sustained, initially recruited motor units will fatigue, creating the need to additionally activate larger motor units. When the exercise is repeated to the point of muscle failure, (near) maximal motor unit recruitment will occur, regardless of the external resistance used (Van Roie, 2013).  Expanding on this, one study was conducted in which a highly fatiguing protocol of 60 repetitions at 20–25% of 1RM was immediately followed (no rest) by a set of 10 repetitions at 40% of 1RM. This mixed low-resistance exercise protocol showed interesting benefits on the dynamic strength and speed of movement of the knee extensors (Van Roie, 2013).  Those studies further showed promising results on speed of movement at different resistances, even though training was performed at a moderate speed. 

Studies conducted by Schoenfeld et al (2016, 2017) led to findings indicating that maximal strength benefits are obtained from the use of heavy loads while muscle hypertrophy can be equally achieved across a spectrum of loading ranges.  This is backed by Dr. Mike Israetel when explaining the time under tension can be equal across a range of weights, so long as the muscle fibers are brought close to or achieve fatigue.  As long as all three components (concentric, isometric, eccentric) of the working muscle are achieved through the majority of the range of motion, muscular gains have been found utilizing as little as 30% of the 1RM.  Schoenfeld’s studies contrasted volume with the analysis using binary frequency as a predictor variable revealed a significant impact of training frequency on hypertrophy effect size (P = 0.002), with the higher frequency being associated with a greater effect size than lower frequency (0.49 ± 0.08 vs. 0.30 ± 0.07, respectively).

 Methods such as these or bodyweight protocols are effective for those who are adverse to weight training or unable to due to contraindications, however, volume was the decisive factor in how much could be achieved wherein multiple sessions per week were superior to a single intense session.  Factors that must be considered when using any program or weight is the proper form and control.  Utilizing improper body mechanics can put extreme stress on the joints and swinging weights around with momentum often relates to injury.  It is paramount to only use weights that can be used in a controlled fashion.  This will not only lessen or eliminate an injury risk but subsequently result in better muscular growth as each phase of the muscle contraction and lengthening phases are used appropriately through the entire lift.  Especially in newer lifters, this means that using a lighter weight for more repetitions is the most appropriate choice.  For experienced lifters, incorporating light-weight can allow for an increase in total volume, leading to additional strength gains and improving muscular endurance.  This approach also trains the nervous system to achieve precise motion to achieve a better neuro-muscular improvement.

It can be overwhelming to begin a strength program with a vast amount of information that seems to be ever-changing.  Experts exist in these areas to assist in setting and reaching goals.  Personal trainers specialize in strength and conditioning while ensuring proper form to prevent injury.  When choosing a personal trainer be alert to their credentialing as the field is largely unregulated and there are “internet experts” who claim experience they may or may not have.  Physical therapists are experts in the non-surgical treatment of injuries or conditions.  As such they are great assets in program creation while considering prevention and treatment of injuries, especially for those with a prior history of injury.  Both the physical therapist and personal trainer should have a great working knowledge of anatomy and physiology which is critical for accurate and individualized program creation.  They often work together for the best possible patient outcome.

 

Overall

The need to maintain strength training is clear.  It is highly transferable to everyday life, the amount of which will be directly affected by the effort put into training and the program design.  Multiple programs can be implemented to retain strength, but the secondary and tertiary effects of training must be considered for the best individual approach.  The coach-client relationship should not be overlooked as it is often the largest contributing factor determining compliance and exertion in training, as any properly implemented program will have benefits over the stagnation of not completing any program at all.

Csapo R, Alegre LM. Effects of resistance training with moderate vs heavy loads on muscle mass and strength in the elderly: A meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2015;26(9):995-1006. doi:10.1111/sms.12536.

Hunter GR, Mccarthy JP, Bamman MM. Effects of Resistance Training on Older Adults. Sports Medicine. 2004;34(5):329-348. doi:10.2165/00007256-200434050-00005.

Kennis E, Verschueren SM, Bogaerts A, Roie EV, Boonen S, Delecluse C. Long-Term Impact of Strength Training on Muscle Strength Characteristics in Older Adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2013;94(11):2054-2060. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.018.

Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine. 2016;46(11):1689-1697. doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0543-8.

Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2017;31(12):3508-3523. doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000002200.

Roie EV, Delecluse C, Coudyzer W, Boonen S, Bautmans I. Strength training at high versus low external resistance in older adults: Effects on muscle volume, muscle strength, and force–velocity characteristics. Experimental Gerontology. 2013;48(11):1351-1361. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2013.08.010.

Better going into surgery, better coming out.

Briana Wasielewski, PTA, CCCE, BS

Having the best rehab after surgery is one of the top priorities of all surgical candidates. Many spend a lot of time getting the best surgeon in place, getting their place to rest in order, and thinking about who can help them with daily life and getting to and from appointments once the surgery is done. While these are all things one should think about prior to surgery, many are not thinking about what they can do to ultimately increase their chances of having a better surgical outcome: exercise prior to surgery. Exercise comes in many forms and is something everyone can do prior to surgery. If done appropriately, exercise before surgery will likely make recovery better. Who better to help figure out your unique pre-op exercise plan than a physical therapist! 

First, a physical therapist will discuss and evaluate your reason for surgery. Many times the reason a patient is thinking about having surgery is that they have pain or their movement is affected. Exercise is usually not something surgical candidates think they can or should do before considering surgery. Prehab exercise is specifically designed by physical therapists to improve the outcome of patients’ post-surgical rehab. The idea here is “the better going into the surgery, the better coming out”. Whether that means breathing exercises, simple strengthening, flexibility work, or practicing how to use crutches, seeing a physical therapist before surgery can help the healing process in the long run.  

A physical therapist prehab visit also gives the opportunity for surgical candidates to ask questions specifically about the most dreaded part of having surgery: the recovery. Physical therapists are experts in rehabilitation and can tell you exactly what to expect in recovery, and how to prepare yourself with pain management tools.  

If you are thinking about having surgery or know someone who is, make sure you prepare yourself and your body by seeing one of our physical/occupational therapists.

Head to our location page to find a clinic near you!

Does Selecting the Right Running Shoe Help Prevent Injury?

Josh Zilm PT, DPT

Does Selecting the Right Running Shoe Help Prevent Injury?

It’s spring and time to strap on those shoes and get outside.

There has been an entire industry built around providing runners with the best possible shoe.  When answering the question, “Does selecting the right running shoe help prevent injury?” one often has to tread lightly as there are many opinions.  As physical therapists, we like to turn to the scientific literature to answer a question.  Can a running shoe offer a return on energy? Is it better to run barefoot?  Are minimalist shoes better? What about orthotics?  Those are topics for another time.  This post will focus only on the running shoe’s ability to reduce injury and not attempt to answer any of those other questions that can often muddy the waters. 

The industry

The running shoe industry dates back to the mid to late 1800s, but most credit the start of the modern-day training shoe to the founder of a little company called Nike when he started selling shoes out of the back of a van in the 1960s.  Since that time running and shoes have grown into a multi-billion dollar industry.  Did you know that the first New York City Marathon was held in 1970 and had 127 competitors?  That is quite a contrast from 52,812 finishers in 2018.  As the sport has grown so has the market for better shoes with an attempt to meet the needs and demands of the runner.  Research, technology, science, expert opinion, and business has delivered a vast shoe market that boast a variety spanning barefoot the ultimate support and cushion.  So with all the shoes available today, is there a shoe for your foot type that can reduce injury associated with rigors of the sport?

The Amazing Foot

The foot is designed to help our bodies absorb energy as we impact the ground in an action called pronation.  The foot and ankle accomplish these amazing feet through a team effort.  We have muscles from our trunk to our feet that actually fine-tune how the body absorbs shock and then in a split second prepares to propel us forward with each step.  Running injuries are most often associated with the loading phase of running and more specifically the rate at which we load.  Don’t be afraid I won’t get too technical, but it is important to understand that the primary focus on injury reduction regarding the shoe is slowing the rate of loading, that is how fast our bodies have to accept the load with each strike of the foot on the ground. 

Foot Type

The hard part about designing the perfect shoe is that there are 7.66 billion people on the planet with a lot of different foot types (I know they are not all runners).  Thankfully, the orthopedic and running world has been able to classify foot type to offer some order to our attempts to best categorize the variety of feet that walk or run into the clinic.  Foot type does offer some predictive value to the injuries that we typically experience.  Nature(genetics) and nurture(lifestyle) lend way to a spectrum of people have rigid high arched feet, flat feet flexible feet, and everything in between.  The shoe industry has tried to match foot type with the appropriate shoe.  For example, the rigid high arch foot type should consider a softer shoe, while the flat flexible foot could use a more supportive shoe. 

The Shoe Spectrum

The soft shoe would be categorized as a “cushioned” shoe while the more supportive shoe is given the name “motion control”.   It would be intuitive to think that a person with a poor ability to control the position of the foot would benefit from added support and the person with a rigid high arch foot may need a little more cushion because they hit the ground harder.  (funny that studies show that joint reaction forces are actually higher in a cushioned shoe versus minimal support.  The working theory is that runners hit the ground harder with a cushioned heel simply because it’s cushioned.)  This could be a multiday conversation, but my attempt is to explain the basic shoe spectrum that starts with no support(barefoot/running sandal) to motion control(high degree of pronation control).  There are many variations within this spectrum that attempt to meet the needs of the runner, but the question we are trying to answer is can we reduce injury by pairing the runner with the right running shoe?   What does the research say?

Theisen et at 2014 Br J Sport Med completed a study looking at over 200 runners.  They found:

1.      Midsole Hardness and Injury rates: no different.  The amount of cushion had no significant difference in injury rates.

2.      Energy absorption and injury risk have no scientific correlation.  A shoe that absorbs energy does not reduce injury rates.

3.      Shoe wear does not appear to have an effect on biomechanics.  You cannot correct your biomechanics by running with a shoe.

4.      1% increase in metabolic cost for every 3.5 ounces of shoes.  Heavy shoes require more energy.

The recommendation:   Promote light shoes.  Refrain from claiming that shoes reduce injury through cushion or biomechanical changes.

Ryan et al. (2011) Br J Sport Med found;

• Shoe assigned by foot posture index(match the shoe with the foot type).  Static foot type should not be the determining factor for shoe selection.  The highest rate of injury was in runners wearing a motion control shoe that were appropriately matched based on foot type. 

The recommendation: Don't use the algorithm alone in an attempt to match foot type and shoe type to dictate the choice of running shoe.

Nielsen et al. (2014) Br J Sports Med.

• Foot pronation was not associated with increased injury risk in novice runners wearing a neutral shoe.  The “Over pronator” did not experience a greater rate of injury when left unsupported versus supported.

The recommendation: Let comfort dictate.  Give the runner a starting point in shoe selection, but do not feel locked into a shoe, especially motion control. 

Conclusion

Shoe type may offer a good starting point for a new runner when selecting shoes.  Based on the current literature I would recommend starting your search with a shoe that matches your foot type, but don’t feel boxed into a certain type of shoe.  Look for something that is comfortable when you run.  In more recent literature motion control shoes have been associated with higher rates of injury which gives rise to concern for recommending a motion control shoe.

Also, a lighter shoe consumes less energy.  The weight of the shoe does matter.   

One of the questions I often ask in the clinic is, “Do you run to get stronger or get stronger to run” (Dr. Chris Powers, USC).  I see a lot of runners try to compensate for bad mechanics through shoes and more running, but the truth is many people lack the strength to support the activity of running.  A physical therapy running evaluation can be a great tool as you begin or return to running.  Injury reduction comes from improved biomechanics something that we are all capable of with the right instruction.  Like many things in running, there are no short cuts.  Consistent effort = results.  The right running shoe may do a lot of things for the athlete, but with the exception of protecting the bottom of the foot and toes, there does not appear to be evidence supporting the claim that they reduce injury rates in runners.